Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA23160; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 10:19:36 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Fri, 29 Dec 1995 10:19:14 -0500 Received: from info.cren.net by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA23119; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 10:19:13 -0500 Received: from [192.52.179.12] (conklin-180c.cren.net [192.52.179.12]) by info.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.4 (CREN)) with SMTP id KAA04417; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 10:19:06 -0500 Message-Id: <199512291519.KAA04417@info.cren.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 10:23:29 +0100 To: Jacob Palme , ietf-drums From: conklin@info.cren.net (Jim Conklin) Subject: Re: I concur with the desirability of a new header for lists to use to identify themselves as distributors of mail. I believe, however, that it's the fact that it's *LIST* mail (as contrasted to individually addressed mail) that's the key item, so I'd recommend including the word "list" in any such header. I'd think Jacob's Mailing-List suggestion for the header name is a good one. I suspect that Robert Elz is right about ths being a topic for a mailing-list group, however. Jim At 12:56 PM 12/29/95 +0100, Jacob Palme wrote: >Mark Crispin wrote: > >> I suggest providing a new header for a mailing list which wishes to >> inject its own name into the headers, e.g. Distributed-From: > ... >I suggest, however, that the name of the new header be >one of the following: > >Mailing-List >Group >Mail-Group > ...