Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id BAA01084; Sat, 30 Dec 1995 01:50:28 -0500
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Sat, 30 Dec 1995 01:50:25 -0500
Received: from wilma.cs.utk.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id BAA01062; Sat, 30 Dec 1995 01:50:24 -0500
Received: from LOCALHOST by wilma.cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.11c-UTK)
          id BAA19138; Sat, 30 Dec 1995 01:50:17 -0500
Message-Id: <199512300650.BAA19138@wilma.cs.utk.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
X-URI: http://www.cs.utk.edu/~moore/
From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
cc: Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se>, ietf-drums <drums@cs.utk.edu>,
        Mail and News integration mailing list <mailnews-l@segate.sunet.se>
reply-to: moore@cs.utk.edu
Subject: let's keep our messages within scope...
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Dec 1995 01:39:08 EST."
             <199512300639.BAA19079@wilma.cs.utk.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 01:50:11 -0500
Sender: moore@cs.utk.edu

Sigh.  I had just sent out mail asking people to keep the mail-to-news 
integration discussion off of the DRUMS list, and then I replied to one of the 
messages addressed to both lists, thus adding to the problem.
Mea culpa.

Anyway, please avoid my mistake and do not mail the same message to both 
groups. (at least not without setting reply-to to point to at most one of 
them!)

Keith