From: <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>
Message-Id: <199601021142.GAA04065@CS.UTK.EDU>
To: moore@cs.utk.edu
cc: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: Header to label lists (was untitled)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Jan 1996 02:27:23 EST." <199601020727.CAA24258@wilma.cs.utk.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 1996 12:42:29 +0100
Sender: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no

As AD for this gang, I'll back Keith in saying that the list-header
is out of scope for DRUMS.

However, as AD for Applications, I'll also say that anyone willing to come
up with an I-D describing such a header, and what it should mean in various
cases and combinations, is *VERY* welcome to do so.

Once we have a draft in hand, we'll probably have to decide whether this
should be:

- Experimental
- Standards-track without a WG
- Standards-track with a WG

and perform appropriate actions.
That is, unless the late lamented(?) "UA-to-UA" or "BOMBS" WG proposals should
somehow magically resurrect themselves and come up with charters that would
subsume this activity.....

                 Harald A