Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA19169; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:28:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.10); Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:27:27 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA19077; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:27:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from resnick1.qualcomm.com (resnick1.qualcomm.com [206.139.85.98]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA19053; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:27:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (206.139.85.99) by resnick1.qualcomm.com with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.1); Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:26:57 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: resnick@resnick1.qualcomm.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <35CA6CE6.DCC40E9B@netscape.com> References: X-Mailer: Eudora [Macintosh version 4.1a14-8.98] Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:26:54 -0500 To: drums@cs.utk.edu From: Pete Resnick Subject: Re: draft-ietf-drums-msg-fmt-05.txt and CR/LF On 8/6/98 at 7:56 PM -0700, John Myers wrote: >I am opposed to bare CRs and LFs in the accept syntax on the grounds >that the 822-bis definition of "7bit text" should not differ from MIME's >definition. Why is this an issue for the accept grammar? 822bis's definition of 7bit text is the same as MIME's in the generate grammar. Why is this not enough? pr -- Pete Resnick QUALCOMM Incorporated Work: (217)337-6377 or (619)651-4478 Fax: (217)337-1980 or (619)651-1102