Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id BAA15290; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 01:00:31 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Sat, 6 Jan 1996 00:58:43 -0500 Received: from bbmail1.unisys.com by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id AAA15177; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 00:58:41 -0500 From: Received: from mvdns1.mv-oc.unisys.com (mvdns1.mv.unisys.com [192.59.253.100]) by bbmail1.unisys.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id FAA02475 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 05:58:01 GMT Received: from bbmail1.unisys.com by mvdns1.mv-oc.unisys.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-1.8) id AB25049; Sat, 6 Jan 96 06:06:57 GMT Date: 05 JAN 96 21:59 To: Subject: Re: "be liberal in what you accept" considered harmful In-Reply-To: Your message of "5 Jan 1996 18:54:18 -0500" Message-Id: O2 5 Jan 1996 18:54:18 -0500, John Gardiner Myers wrote: > "Be liberal in what you accept" can actually be a quite harmful > practice. It's use papers over problems which otherwise would be > noticed and fixed. (John goes on to provide examples of how being "liberal" can be dangerous, and one where being "conservative" resulted in widespread broken software being fixed.) This is a good point, but if someone implements a new mail system today, and rejects messages that do not conform to the standards, it will be seen as unable to interoperate. Wbat's a software developer to do? |Randall Gellens | randy@mv.unisys.com| |(714) 380-6350 | fax (714)597-8053 can add ,,,,,,,,6350| |Mail Stop MV 237 | Net**2 656-6350| |Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak only for myself| Randomly selected tag: In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.