Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id JAA04026; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 09:13:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.11); Mon, 17 Aug 1998 09:11:28 -0400 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id JAA03911; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 09:11:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sws5.ctd.ornl.gov (sws5.ctd.ornl.gov [128.219.128.125]) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id JAA03896; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 09:11:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 96072 invoked by uid 3995); 17 Aug 1998 13:11:23 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <13784.11258.619821.445035@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 09:11:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Dave Sill To: DRUMS@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: serious VRFY ambiguity In-Reply-To: <199808150401.AAA13803@spot.cs.utk.edu> References: <980814162316.208e55ac@Cisco.COM> <199808150401.AAA13803@spot.cs.utk.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.59 under 20.3 "Vatican City" XEmacs Lucid Organization: Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA X-Face: "p~Q]mg{;e*}YR|)&Q/&Q\*~5UWfZX34;5M Keith Moore wrote: >Here's an attempt to refine Dan's suggestion: I like Keith's refinement of Dan Wing's wording. -Dave