Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id GAA12516; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 06:52:21 -0500
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Mon, 8 Jan 1996 06:51:33 -0500
Received: from domen.uninett.no by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id GAA12494; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 06:51:28 -0500
From: <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>
Message-Id: <199601081151.GAA12494@CS.UTK.EDU>
Received: from domen.uninett.no by domen.uninett.no with SMTP (PP) 
          id <21720-0@domen.uninett.no>; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 12:51:10 +0100
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Alan Barrett <apb@iafrica.com>
cc: Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se>,
        Mail and News integration mailing list <mailnews-l@segate.sunet.se>,
        ietf-drums <drums@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: The syntax of Message-ID
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 07 Jan 1996 19:10:54 +0200." <Pine.NEB.3.91.960107190251.131J@apb.iafrica.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 12:51:08 +0100
Sender: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no

Note that the RFC 1327 specification uses the pseudo-domain @MHS to construct
RFC-822 unique message-identifiers from X.400 unique message-identifiers.
So - if we don't want to invalidate 1327, we must say that the domain part
of the message-ID *should* be that of the submitting host.

       harald A