Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id SAA28302; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 18:14:02 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Thu, 18 Jan 1996 18:12:43 -0500 Received: from po10.andrew.cmu.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id SAA28243; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 18:12:41 -0500 Received: (from postman@localhost) by po10.andrew.cmu.edu (8.7.1/8.7.1) id SAA00953 for drums@cs.utk.edu; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 18:12:32 -0500 Received: via switchmail; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 18:12:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 18:11:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 18:11:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from BatMail.robin.v2.14.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c.411 via MS.5.6.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c_411; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 18:11:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 18:11:18 -0500 (EST) From: John Gardiner Myers To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: A suggestion for IPv6 domain literals In-Reply-To: <199601181853.NAA04647@CS.UTK.EDU> References: <199601181853.NAA04647@CS.UTK.EDU> The suggestion I made earlier on the ipng list is just to use domain syntax: 432100000001000200030004056789ab.ip6.int That way, we don't have to muck around with the syntax of a "domain" and we can limit knowledge of such things to mail transport agents. -- _.John G. Myers Internet: jgm+@CMU.EDU LoseNet: ...!seismo!ihnp4!wiscvm.wisc.edu!give!up