Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) 
        by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id QAA11831; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:47:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.11); Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:43:41 -0500
Received:  
        by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id QAA11628; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:43:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dataarch-mail.mcit.com ([166.35.80.199]) 
        by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id QAA11449; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:40:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dataarch1.bos.mci.net (dataarch1.mcit.com [166.35.80.193])
 by DATAARCH-MAIL.MCIT.COM (PMDF V5.2-27 #32965)
 with SMTP id <01J3FOG5TUKC0025UR@DATAARCH-MAIL.MCIT.COM> for drums@cs.utk.edu;
 Mon, 26 Oct 1998 17:52:11 EDT
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:40:23 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: John C Klensin <klensin@mci.net>
Subject: Re: Status of the drafts?
In-reply-to: <199810261038.LAA00421@quill.thinkcoach.com>
To: Norbert Bollow <nb@thinkcoach.com>
Cc: drums@cs.utk.edu
Message-id: <SIMEON.9810261623.K@dataarch1.mci.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Simeon for Win32 Version 4.1.5 Build (42)
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Priority: NORMAL
X-Authentication: none
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>


On Mon, 26 Oct 1998 11:38:30 +0100 Norbert Bollow 
<nb@thinkcoach.com> wrote:

> > It's been two months since the Chicago meeting and a month since the
> > posting of the minutes of the meeting. There has been a small amount of
> > discussion of changes to the two drafts, but not much. What is the status
> > of the drafts? Are we ready for last calls yet?
> 
> I still think it would be good to clarify in what cases it is
> permissible to use a null return-path. (This was on the agenda of the
> Chicago meeting, but is seems that it did not get discussed due to time
> constraints.)

The 821bis editor would appreciate this clarification, 
especially if it can be done quickly and with a minimum of 
flaming.

   john