Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id MAA17198; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 12:07:19 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 12:07:18 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from po8.andrew.cmu.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id MAA17191; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 12:07:17 -0400 Received: (from postman@localhost) by po8.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA10001 for drums@cs.utk.edu; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 12:07:13 -0400 Received: via switchmail; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 12:07:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 12:06:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 12:06:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from BatMail.robin.v2.14.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c.411 via MS.5.6.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c_411; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 12:06:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 1995 12:06:12 -0400 (EDT) From: John Gardiner Myers To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU Subject: TURN In-Reply-To: <3122.802019593@dbc.mtview.ca.us> References: <3122.802019593@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Beak: is Not I do have an internet draft out defining an ESMTP Authentication option. This could make actually implementing TURN practical, but I suspect that, given the way SMTP is actually implemented, a new "tickle a queue run" extension is preferable. -- _.John G. Myers Internet: jgm+@CMU.EDU LoseNet: ...!seismo!ihnp4!wiscvm.wisc.edu!give!up