Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id BAA09174; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 01:42:15 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Wed, 24 Jan 1996 01:41:13 -0500 Received: from glaucus.cso.uiuc.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id BAA09117; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 01:41:06 -0500 Received: from resnick1.isdn.uiuc.edu by glaucus.cso.uiuc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA06156; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 00:35:57 -0600 X-Sender: resnick@glaucus.cso.uiuc.edu Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Eudora [Macintosh version 3.0a74-2.96] Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 00:41:01 -0600 To: "Eric Norman (MACC)" From: Pete Resnick Subject: Re: Getting rid of Encrypted and group syntax Cc: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no, drums@cs.utk.edu On 1/23/96 at 10:01 PM, Eric Norman (MACC) wrote: >There are other things that should go also. Two that I can >think of offhand are the Encrypted: header and the group:; >construct. I don't know enough about Encrypted to say anything. Group syntax needs to be kept around, though. For those MTAs which refuse to accept mail which does not have any recipients on the To: line, group syntax is a nice legal way to satisfy those mailers and still keep recipients off of the To: line. pr -- Pete Resnick QUALCOMM Incorporated Home: (217)337-1905 / Fax: (217)337-1980