Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id UAA23899; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 20:26:03 -0500
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Wed, 24 Jan 1996 20:25:12 -0500
Received: from CU.NIH.GOV by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id UAA23778; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 20:25:11 -0500
Message-Id: <199601250125.UAA23778@CS.UTK.EDU>
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
From: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
Date:     Wed, 24 Jan 1996  20:22:19 EST
Subject:  Re:  A suggestion for IPv6 domain literals

> > I agree that logging IP numbers is quite valuable; however, that has
> > to do with the format of addresses in RFC822 or RFC821.
>
> Uh, where do you think this is logged?  Don't you think that Received: headers
> are part of RFC821/RFC822?

If we end up using something like 32-hex.IP6.INT for domain literals in
email addresses, I hope that doesn't mean we have to use that instead
of standard format IPv6 addresses for logging in Received headers.