Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id XAA06472; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 23:11:41 -0500
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.3); Wed, 24 Jan 1996 23:10:19 -0500
Received: from jekyll.piermont.com by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id XAA06278; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 23:10:15 -0500
Received: from localhost (perry@localhost) by jekyll.piermont.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA13785; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 23:09:54 -0500
Message-Id: <199601250409.XAA13785@jekyll.piermont.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: jekyll.piermont.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Roger Fajman" <RAF@CU.NIH.GOV>
cc: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: A suggestion for IPv6 domain literals 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 24 Jan 1996 20:22:19 EST."
             <199601250125.UAA23778@CS.UTK.EDU> 
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 23:09:49 -0500
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>


"Roger Fajman" writes:
> If we end up using something like 32-hex.IP6.INT for domain literals in
> email addresses, I hope that doesn't mean we have to use that instead
> of standard format IPv6 addresses for logging in Received headers.

In those instances where you can't reverse map the addresses, you can
always put parenthesized comments into the headers with the standard
IPv6 addrs in them.

Perry