Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id EAA03178; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 04:55:04 -0500 (EST) Received: by cs.cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 12 Feb 1999 04:53:54 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (cf v2.9s-UTK) id EAA03055; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 04:53:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from out0.mx.skynet.be (out0.mx.skynet.be [195.238.2.35]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id EAA02983; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 04:53:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by out0.mx.skynet.be (8.9.1/jovi-relay-2.0b1) with SMTP id KAA27296; Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:53:19 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.24.19990212103036.00b7daf0@shell2.bayarea.net> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 2.4b2 X-URL: http://www.skynet.be x-sender: blk@foxbert.skynet.be Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:17:17 +0100 To: Dave Crocker CC: drums@cs.utk.edu From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Who wanted to eliminate the tokenizer? Message-Id: <19990212101717.001066@relay.skynet.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, Feb 12, 1999, Dave Crocker wrote: >There is also the formal challenge process which invokes an IESG review of >working group process. Of course, that actually requires that there is someone over at the IESG who hasn't yet set up procmail so as to /dev/null everything coming from Dan, so maybe that step might be a little hard for him to take. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ____________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, News/mail/FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ The Sky is no longer the limit