Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 12:33:05 -0500
From: John C Klensin <klensin@mci.net>
Subject: Re: More DRUMS procedural problems
In-reply-to: <19990212094157.025717@relay.skynet.be>
To: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be>
Cc: drums@cs.utk.edu, iesg@ietf.org, Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Message-id: <EXECMAIL.990212123305.F@p2.mci.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="ipm.txt"
Content-disposition: inline; filename="ipm.txt"
Priority: NORMAL
References: <19990212094157.025717@relay.skynet.be>
 <SIMEON.9902111728.S@dataarch1.mci.net>

On Fri, 12 Feb 1999 09:41:57 +0100 Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> 
wrote:

>     I don't know how possible this is at this late stage, but it would be
> helpful for me to have some sort of tagging that said something like "[
> strawman text follows ]" and "[ strawman text ends ]", so that I have
> some idea as to what has been argued about before (and hopefully some
> sort of consensus has arisen) and what is a relatively new proposal that
> might need some attention focussed on it.

I'll see what I can do for -10.  Tried something like that for a
while, but it just got too messy relative to just trying to 
point the changes out in section X.1 (and to call special 
attention to the really serious ones in X.2 and email notes to 
the list).

Thanks for the kind words.

    john