Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA21364; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:11:40 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.4); Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:10:36 -0500 Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA21236; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:10:34 -0500 Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 666); 29 Feb 1996 21:12:12 GMT Date: 29 Feb 1996 21:12:12 GMT Message-ID: <19960229211212.20787.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu> From: djb@koobera.math.uic.edu (D. J. Bernstein) To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: comments from a newcomer > You can't crash them, but they won't pass the data unmangled. But that's a different issue. There are relays that mangle NUL; should SMTP prohibit sending NUL? > Sendmail never ignored it and has been the most popular MTA -- I don't > recall it passing eight bit data until the standards recently allowed > it via extensions. sendmail V8 transmits 8-bit data by default (in violation of RFC 821, of course). This has been default since version 6.57. > > Why are you deliberately making de jure standards that don't match the > > de facto standards? > None of this is new. I know. That doesn't answer the question. ---Dan