Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id CAA26920; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 02:17:41 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.4); Tue, 5 Mar 1996 02:16:06 -0500 Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id CAA26841; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 02:16:03 -0500 Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 666); 5 Mar 1996 07:17:44 GMT Date: 5 Mar 1996 07:17:44 GMT Message-ID: <19960305071744.3858.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu> From: djb@koobera.math.uic.edu (D. J. Bernstein) To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: proposed agenda for 8 March WG meeting > Are you suggesting that the optimal server behavior is: I meant exactly what I said: except in extreme circumstances, good MTAs can achieve much lower latency with separate SMTP connections than with multiple RCPTs. sendmail can't, but my MTA, qmail, can and does. > That's ridiculous. Only if you force yourself into a serial view of the universe. > Even without PIPELINING, you're wrong. You are completely and utterly wrong, and I expect an apology. ---Dan