Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id PAA04300; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 15:00:06 -0500
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.4); Tue, 5 Mar 1996 14:59:14 -0500
Received: from info.cren.net by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id OAA04183; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 14:59:12 -0500
Received: from [192.52.179.12] (conklin-180c.cren.net [192.52.179.12]) by info.cren.net (8.6.12/8.6.4 (CREN)) with SMTP id OAA13611; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 14:54:07 -0500
Message-Id: <199603051954.OAA13611@info.cren.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 14:59:25 +0100
To: djb@koobera.math.uic.edu (D. J. Bernstein), drums@cs.utk.edu
From: conklin@info.cren.net (Jim Conklin)
Subject: Re: proposed agenda for 8 March WG meeting

At  4:05 PM 3/5/96 +0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote, about Pipelining:
> ...
>Oh, really? What percentage of SMTP servers support it?
> ...
>For a parallel MTA it's certainly not ``absolutely essential.'' It's a
>_slight_ bandwidth gain. ...

  My apologies!  You said "pipelining" and I thought "parallel MTA".

Jim