Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id FAA19346; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 05:35:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Mon, 12 Jun 2000 05:32:33 -0400 Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id FAA19144; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 05:32:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from draco.cus.cam.ac.uk (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id FAA19131; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 05:32:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from draco.cus.cam.ac.uk (131.111.8.18 -> draco.cus.cam.ac.uk) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Mon, 12 Jun 2000 05:32:30 -0400 Received: from ph10 (helo=localhost) by draco.cus.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.14 #4) id 131Qa4-0003yJ-00; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 10:32:28 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 10:32:28 +0100 (BST) From: Philip Hazel To: Maurizio Codogno cc: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: Outstanding issues for smtpupd-12 In-Reply-To: <200006081527.RAA25327@beatles.cselt.it> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Maurizio Codogno wrote: > > (b) State clearly that bare CR and bare LF are permitted in > > running text, but are to be considered as textual > > characters, never line terminators. This probably causes > > interoperability problems but is, in principle, possible > > I'd prefer this. Me too, as I am among those who believe in 8-bit clean mail. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, ph10@cus.cam.ac.uk Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.