Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA05750; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 14:28:49 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.4); Thu, 7 Mar 1996 14:28:28 -0500 Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA05704; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 14:28:24 -0500 Received: from UW-Gateway.Panda.COM by Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (NX5.67f2/UW-NDC Revision: 2.27.MRC ) id AA19818; Thu, 7 Mar 96 11:27:51 -0800 Received: from localhost by Ikkoku-Kan.Panda.COM (NX5.67e/UW-NDC/Panda Revision: 2.27.MRC ) id AA12404; Thu, 7 Mar 96 11:27:27 -0800 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 11:25:47 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Crispin Sender: Mark Crispin Subject: Re: Message format document outline To: John Gardiner Myers Cc: drums@cs.utk.edu In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII On Thu, 7 Mar 1996 13:16:09 -0500 (EST), John Gardiner Myers wrote: > > From : Mark Crispin > > Subject : blurdybloop > > Message-ID : > > These are all illegal per RFC 822 and should continue to be illegal. Where does 822 say this? I'm pretty sure that I remember an emphatic statement otherwise. Certainly that was the case in the working group; that's why the BNF has things like "From" ":" and not "From:".