Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA13013; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 22:55:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Sat, 22 Jul 2000 22:53:01 -0400 Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA12842; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 22:53:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id WAA12829; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 22:53:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (131.193.178.181 -> koobera.math.uic.edu) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Sat, 22 Jul 2000 22:53:00 -0400 Received: (qmail 19499 invoked by uid 1001); 23 Jul 2000 02:53:21 -0000 Date: 23 Jul 2000 02:53:21 -0000 Message-ID: <20000723025321.8577.qmail@cr.yp.to> From: "D. J. Bernstein" To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: MX lookups in dumb clients References: <1461297.3173012530@nifty-jr.west.sun.com> <20000720001401.19958.qmail@cr.yp.to> <39773C1E.A22B87B4@cisco.com> <7iLHEVKXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Unsubscribe: Kai Henningsen writes: > OTOH, I also think that the doc doesn't actually prescribes > any behaviour for this case. Oops, you're right. Klensin's bad text in smtpupd-10 (the relay name ``SHOULD be processed'' by the MX procedure) disappeared in smtpupd-11. I didn't catch this change. My apologies. ---Dan