Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA10638; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 16:35:53 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 16:35:51 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from po8.andrew.cmu.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA10628; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 16:35:47 -0400 Received: (from postman@localhost) by po8.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id QAA19209 for drums@CS.UTK.EDU; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 16:35:16 -0400 Received: via switchmail; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 16:35:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 16:33:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 16:33:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from BatMail.robin.v2.14.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c.411 via MS.5.6.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c_411; Thu, 1 Jun 1995 16:33:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 1995 16:33:25 -0400 (EDT) From: John Gardiner Myers To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: address syntax In-Reply-To: References: Beak: is Not Mark Crispin writes: > That's OK, but it changes the interpretation if a parser gets one of those > things, doesn't it? Or are you just going to make it invalid syntax? Invalid syntax. "\" is a special, it's not allowed in a word.