Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA07330; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 14:45:45 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.4); Mon, 11 Mar 1996 14:45:05 -0500 Received: from mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA07152; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 14:45:01 -0500 Received: from muri.cs.mu.OZ.AU by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.50); id AA03565 Tue, 12 Mar 1996 06:28:43 +1100 (from kre@munnari.OZ.AU) To: Mark Crispin Cc: John Gardiner Myers , drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: Free insertion of linear-white-space In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 11 Mar 1996 10:35:21 -0800." Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 06:29:00 +1100 Message-Id: <23978.826572540@munnari.OZ.AU> From: Robert Elz Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 10:35:21 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Crispin Message-ID: It does not matter that 822bis permits blurdybloop@]sara[.soop. or not. Separate rules for DNS syntax ... Be careful here, make sure you understand just where your rules are coming from. The DNS itself has *no* rules on what is a legal name (other than that it be < 256 bytes, with none of the parts between the dots being longer than 63 bytes - and definitely "bytes", or octets if you prefer, there, not characters). All rules must come from elsewhere - that could be the hostname rules (rfc952) which really is obsolete now, or from 822, or someplace else (section 2.1 of rfc1123 perhaps). Please be sure that the rules you want to apply actually exist somewhere before deleting them from 822. Note that 1123 says (if interpreted the way it seems to be written) that user@10.1.2.3 SHOULD be acceptable - where we all know that it isn't, and we most certainly don't want it to be. In any case, deleting . (at least) from specials was rejected, not because of what it mighth permit in the domain, but because of what it would permit in the local part (where there are certainly no other rules that can apply). kre