Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id TAA11047; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 19:53:10 -0500 Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.4); Tue, 12 Mar 1996 19:53:04 -0500 Received: from po10.andrew.cmu.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id TAA11028; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 19:53:02 -0500 Received: (from postman@localhost) by po10.andrew.cmu.edu (8.7.4/8.7.1) id TAA01021 for drums@cs.utk.edu; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 19:52:58 -0500 Received: via switchmail; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 19:52:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 19:52:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 19:52:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from BatMail.robin.v2.14.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c.411 via MS.5.6.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c_411; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 19:52:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 19:52:08 -0500 (EST) From: John Gardiner Myers To: drums@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: \-quoting In-Reply-To: <19960312235939.2768.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu> References: <19960312235939.2768.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu> djb@koobera.math.uic.edu (D. J. Bernstein) writes: > The last I heard was that the sendmail people weren't going to do this, > because it means breaking lots of forward files and aliases. Part of the process of getting it fixed involves convincing the sendmail people that it does not in fact break forward files and aliases, since the backslashes in those occur outside double quotes. This is being handled in a context appropriate to sendmail development. I don't want to go into it in too much detail on this list. Note that I did *not* claim that it will be fixed, nor did I claim that a fix will be in any particular future version. -- _.John G. Myers Internet: jgm+@CMU.EDU LoseNet: ...!seismo!ihnp4!wiscvm.wisc.edu!give!up