Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA10541; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 15:20:21 -0400 X-Resent-To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU ; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 15:20:20 EDT Errors-to: owner-drums@CS.UTK.EDU Received: from po8.andrew.cmu.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA10520; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 15:20:18 -0400 Received: (from postman@localhost) by po8.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA16311 for drums@cs.utk.edu; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 15:20:07 -0400 Received: via switchmail; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 15:20:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 15:19:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 15:19:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from BatMail.robin.v2.14.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c.411 via MS.5.6.hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4c_411; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 15:19:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Jun 1995 15:19:28 -0400 (EDT) From: John Gardiner Myers To: drums@CS.UTK.EDU Subject: Re: address syntax In-Reply-To: <199506051751.NAA10367@augusta.math.psu.edu> References: <199506051751.NAA10367@augusta.math.psu.edu> Beak: is Not Dave Barr writes: > Is it within the charter of drums to legitimize the percent hack? I suggest you re-read what 1123 says about the topic. -- _.John G. Myers Internet: jgm+@CMU.EDU LoseNet: ...!seismo!ihnp4!wiscvm.wisc.edu!give!up