Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id MAA05619; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 12:16:31 -0500
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (bulk_mailer v1.4); Wed, 20 Mar 1996 12:16:00 -0500
Received: from koobera.math.uic.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK)
	id MAA05554; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 12:15:58 -0500
Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 666); 20 Mar 1996 17:16:21 GMT
Date: 20 Mar 1996 17:16:21 GMT
Message-ID: <19960320171621.284.qmail@koobera.math.uic.edu>
From: djb@koobera.math.uic.edu (D. J. Bernstein)
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: msg-id

> In other words, Dan, the intent behind Received is that it be
> machine processable.

Sorry, Dave, but I don't think that's true. ``Received: lines are
primarily intended for humans tracing mail routes.''

(Of course, the proposals at hand do absolutely nothing to improve
the machine-readability of Received lines.)

---Dan