From: p2p-hackers@zgp.org (Sean R. Lynch KG6CVV)
Replying To: Zooko <p2p-hackers@zgp.org>
Date: Sun Jul 14 12:22:02 2002
Subject: [p2p-hackers] reply-to

--=-CIFrJwDWfSpcemUkX641
Content-Type: text/plain 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am strongly opposed to having Reply-To go to the list.  It is FAR less
embarrassing (and annoying) to accidentally send a public message to the
poster than it is to accidentally send a private message to the list. I
speak from LOTS of experience having to watch people's private
conversations going on on mailing lists.

Besides, any decent MUA software has a "group reply" or "list reply"
function. 

On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 13:06, Zooko wrote:
>=20
> It seems preferable to me that when you reply to a mailing list message, =
your 
> reply goes back to the mailing list by default, and if you want it *not* =
to do 
> so you have to make an explicit choice.  That seems preferable to the rev=
erse. 
>=20
> However, if there is a consensus for the other setting then I'll change i= t.
>=20
> Hm..  Haven't we had this dicussion before?  Oh yes, google tells me that=
=20 
> I changed it to "reply-to the list" more than a year ago when several peo=
ple 
> requested that I do so...
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Zooko
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> p2p-hackers mailing list
> p2p-hackers@zgp.org
> http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers --=20
Sean R.  Lynch KG6CVV  http://www.chaosring.org/~seanl/

--=-CIFrJwDWfSpcemUkX641
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7  (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9Mc8jmvPkVW5ztpERAm9nAJ9ki0ynD/1UC3r98eOlHiGYNZb3MQCffrxv
Pfq+lXdL0pDXszx2fm74pDw= 
=Tw8P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-CIFrJwDWfSpcemUkX641--