From: p2p-hackers@zgp.org (Adam Langley)
Replying To: Sean R. Lynch KG6CVV <p2p-hackers@zgp.org>
Date: Mon Jul 15 06:51:02 2002
Subject: [p2p-hackers] reply-to

On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 12:21:07PM -0700, Sean R. Lynch KG6CVV wrote:
> Besides, any decent MUA software has a "group reply" or "list reply"
> function.

Well, I support setting the Reply-To. Despite reading many posts on the
evils of Reply-To I've still yet to see any good argument against. 

But for those who want it set,  and it isn't:

:0
* List-Id: Peer-to-peer development.* 
| formail -i "Reply-To: p2p-hackers@zgp.org" >> /home/USER/mail/p2phackers

And for when it is set,  and you don't want it to be:

:0
* List-Id: Peer-to-peer development.* 
| formail -R "Reply-To" "X-Reply-To" >> /home/USER/mail/p2phackers

(P.S.  test those first)

--
Adam Langley                                      agl@imperialviolet.org
http://www.imperialviolet.org                       (+44) (0)7986 296753
PGP: 9113   256A   CC0F   71A6   4C84   5087   CDA5   52DF   2CB6   3D60